Lusaka Agreement Wikipedia

Establishing the agreement of the Government of the Republic of Angola and UNITA on general and specific principles and procedures relating to the agenda items of the Lusaka II talks. 8. In accord with the provisions of paragraph 4, paragraph (c), the general principles relating to national reconciliation, above, UNITA members appointed for positions in the central government and diplomatic missions abroad, the specific principles referred to in paragraph 7 with regard to national reconciliation and UNITA members, who will assume the functions in the high offices of the national police. , performs its duties no later than immediately after the completion of item II (1) b) of the agenda covered in paragraph 3 of the specific principles. In each of these cases, the implementation of the previous provisions of paragraph 8 of the provisions of this paragraph of the modalities of national reconciliation is preferred by agreement between the Government and UNITA, if the required conditions are deemed to be met for that purpose. Representatives of the Southern African Development Community, the Organization of African Unity and the United Nations met in Lusaka and drafted the ceasefire agreement from 21 to 27 June 1999. The defence and foreign ministers of the parties to the conflict then met from 29 June to 7 July to discuss the agreement. [1] 2.3 Make the final decision regarding possible offences. If the agreements are not complied with, you assume that you will take the necessary steps to establish the identification of the offence, and to make the final decision on the treatment of the above-mentioned offences. Zambian President Frederick Chiluba played an important role in signing the agreement as president of the regional peace initiative in the Democratic Republic of Congo. [1] The Vorgan radio program remained unchanged. UNAVEM stated that “the long-standing issue of the transformation of the UNITA radio station into a bipartisan broadcaster has not yet been fully resolved. Although agreement has been reached on the name and other details of the transmitter, the issue of frequency allocation is still under discussion. 2 In another government response, General Higino Carneiro added greater ambiguity to the issue of amnesty by suggesting that Savimbi`s refusal to limit the required number of unita troops to which the Lusaka agreement was concluded was the problem.

This indicated a “catch 22” scenario. According to Savimbi, if UNITA forces were bombed by government forces, they would not yet have an amnesty. For example, Savimbi said he should remain mobilized as long as the government continues to pursue UNITA militarily. Meanwhile, General Higino suggested that the violence was continuing because UNITA had not demobilized under the plan.